Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Specifications, where the Core Ultra 9 285K sits for gaming, the graphics card worth pairing with it, and the frame rate the pair returns at every resolution.
GeForce RTX 4090
The Core Ultra 9 285K and the GeForce RTX 4090 return about 133 fps on High at 1440p with neither part wasting the other. A card slower than the GeForce RTX 4090 wastes the Core Ultra 9 285K, and a faster one runs straight into it.
Check current priceon Amazon See the full bottleneck result for this pairCore Ultra 9 285K specifications
| Manufacturer | Intel |
| Released | 2024 |
| Cores and threads | 24 cores, 24 threads |
| Boost clock | 5.7 GHz |
| TDP | 125 W |
| Gaming performance index | 90.0 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D = 100) |
| Multithread index | 196.0 |
What these numbers mean for the Core Ultra 9 285K
On our index the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 90.0, which places it 12th of the 83 processors we track and puts it faster than roughly 87% of them.
The Core Ultra 9 285K and the Ryzen 9 7900X3D land on exactly the same index score of 90.0, so on raw throughput the two are interchangeable and the choice between them comes down to memory, power draw and price on the day.
The Core Ultra 9 285K is a far stronger multithread chip than its gaming rank suggests: 196.0 for throughput against 90.0 for games, a gap of 118% that is the whole reason to buy a Core Ultra 9 285K if you render, compile, encode or stream alongside playing. For gaming alone, a cheaper chip with a gaming index near 90.0 does the same job.
With 24 cores and 24 threads the Core Ultra 9 285K has far more parallel capacity than any game will use. That capacity is worth paying for if you also render or stream on the processor and worth nothing if you only play, which is the whole case for reading its 196.0 multithread score separately from its gaming score.
Core Ultra 9 285K frame rate at each resolution
The Core Ultra 9 285K paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 on the High preset with 16 GB of system memory. The processor is the limit at all three resolutions here, so the Core Ultra 9 285K only drops 49% from 154 fps to 78 fps across them and keeps capacity it is never asked for.
| Resolution | Estimated fps | Limited by |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p (1920 x 1080) | 154 fps | CPU |
| 1440p (2560 x 1440) | 133 fps | Balanced |
| 4K (3840 x 2160) | 78 fps | Balanced |
How the Core Ultra 9 285K compares
6 processors sit within 30% of the Core Ultra 9 285K on our gaming index, running from the Ryzen 7 9850X3D at +14% to the Core i9-14900K at +6%, a window narrow enough that price, memory and power decide it rather than raw speed.
What to pair with the Core Ultra 9 285K, and when to upgrade
Check the Core Ultra 9 285K against your own parts
Core Ultra 9 285K specifications on this page are from Intel, while its gaming index of 90.0 is modelled from published benchmark data for the Core Ultra 9 285K rather than measured on a test bench, and every frame rate above follows from that figure. How we calculate this